Access to justice is not just getting the
right or the justice or solution to one’s legal problems, it is allowing the
opportunity for everyone in the society to bring a legal problem to a person
who can decide the issues and if necessary provide an appropriate remedy.[1]
It encompasses a number of different aspects, for example the fairness with
which litigants are treated, the justness of result delivered, the speed with
which case are processed and the responsiveness of the system to those who use
it.[2] More also, access to justice refers to the
equity with which those from differing backgrounds are able to gain from
justice delivery system.[3]
Access to justice has its foundations in the international human rights law
that addresses the right to equality of people before the law, equal protection
under the law, and the right to be treated fairly by a tribunal or court.
[4]
The concept of
access to justice has evolved significantly over time, reflecting broader
societal changes. In ancient civilizations, justice was often administered by
local leaders or monarchs, with limited access for the general populace. The
Magna Carta of 1215 marked a pivotal moment, establishing the principle that
everyone, including the king, was subject to the law.[5] This laid the groundwork
for more inclusive legal systems, although true access to justice remained
limited to the elite for centuries. The 20th century saw significant
advancements in access to justice, particularly after World War II. The
establishment of the United Nations and the adoption of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 emphasized the importance of legal equality
and the right to a fair trial. Many countries introduced legal aid systems to
help those who could not afford legal representation, reflecting a growing
recognition that access to justice is a fundamental human right.
[6]
In recent decades,
the focus has shifted towards ensuring that access to justice is not only
available but also effective.[7] This includes addressing
barriers such as economic inequality, discrimination, and lack of awareness on
legal rights. Modern initiatives often emphasize the need for legal
empowerment, community-based justice systems, and the use of technology to make
legal processes more accessible.[8] These efforts aim to
create a more equitable legal landscape where everyone can seek and obtain
justice regardless of their socio-economic status.[9]
The history of
access to justice in Tanzania is deeply rooted in its colonial past. During
the German colonial period, the land covering mainland Tanzania was called the
German East Africa. It was subjected to the German colonial rule from 1886 up
to the end of the First World War 1918.[10]
There were two system in the administration of justice which was racial based.
One for the natives and another for non-natives.
[11] For natives’ German
adversarial system in administration of justice was employed whereas in
non-native where German rule was not sufficiently consolidated, the traditional
authorities continued to settle disputes according to traditional procedures.[12]
After German had lost in the First World
War vide article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, Tanganyika now
Tanzania was renamed Tanganyika Territory following the Tanganyika Order in
Council of 1920 and became under British
rule.[13] During the British
colonial period, Tanzania, then known as Tanganyika, adopted the common law
legal system in 1920.[14] This system was
adversarial, requiring parties to compete in court to obtain their rights,
often favouring those with more resources and legal knowledge.[15] The legal framework was
largely static, failing to incorporate local customs and practices which
limited access to justice for many Tanzanians.
The British regime established two
separate structures of judicial hierarchy. The first limb being the high court
and the second one was the subordinate courts.[16] The two limbs operated
according to English law on one hand and when both disputants were natives’
application of customary law was resorted. The high court had appellate, revision,
review (supervisory) jurisdiction over subordinate courts. The decisions of the
high court were appealable to East Africa Court of Appeal. During this period,
different laws were codified and used in administration of justice, namely
Tanganyika Order in Council, The Subordinates Courts Ordinance, 1930, Criminal
Procedure Code, and Civil Procedure Code to name but few. All these laws gave
the procedures to be followed in access to justice.
After independence, the colonial laws were
maintained and the process of integration of native courts into the general
court system was made vide the enactment of the Magistrates Court Act 1963
which became effective on 1st July 1963.[17] A
new hierarchy court system was established. That is to say, the Primary Court,
District Court, Resident Magistrate Court and the High Court.[18] The adversarial system of
dispute settlement is the one in place where for the action to commence the
plaintiff is to set the procedure in motion from the beginning up to the end.
The courts play a minimal role of regulating the procedures in accordance with
the law.
Post-independence,
Tanzania made efforts to reform its legal system to better serve its citizens.
The introduction of legal aid services and the establishment of the Tanganyika
Law Society were significant steps towards improving access to justice.[19] However, challenges such
as the high cost of legal proceedings, bureaucratic court procedures, and
delays in case resolution continued to impede justice for many, particularly
the poor and marginalized.[20] These issues highlighted
the need for further reforms to make the legal system more accessible and
efficient. In recent years, Tanzania has focused on legal empowerment and
community-based justice systems to enhance access to justice.[21] Initiatives aimed to
decentralize legal services, simplifying court procedures, and increasing
public awareness about their legal rights have been implemented.[22] Additionally, the use of
technology to streamline legal processes and provide legal information has been
promoted. These efforts aim to create a more inclusive legal system where all
Tanzanians can seek and obtain justice, regardless of their socio-economic
status.
In Tanzania, the right of access to
justice is a constitutionally guaranteed fundamental human right.[23]
This right is fundamental in the administration of justice. The
right requires courts to be accessible to all persons without unnecessary and
unjustified restrictions.[24]
The administration of justice is an exclusive constitution mandate of the
Judiciary of Tanzania vide articles 4, 107B of the Constitution of the United
Republic of Tanzania of 1977. To accomplish the objectives of the judiciary in
administration of justice and to ease access to justice, on 6th
November 2023 the judiciary established the Electronic Case Management System
(e-CMS) to increase efficiency in judiciary businesses.
[25]
[1] Boshe P. and Mbezi P, ‘The value
of pro bono service in accessing justice in Tanzania’
<https://deliverypdf.ssrn.com/delivery.php> Accessed 12 January 2024.
[2] Kennedy G, ‘Access to Justice and
Inevitable Reforms to the Civil Justice System: Reflections on Case Management
and Legal Aid in Tanzania’ LST Law Review (Vol. 1, Issue 1, 2016) 19.
[3] Richard B, ‘Access to justice in
Africa: Comparisons between Sierra Leone, Tanzania and Zambia’ <https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/112459/NO130CT09.pdf> Accessed 12 January 2024
[4] Universal Declaration of Human Rights (adopted
10 December 1948 UNGA Res 217 A(III)) art 8
[5] Couto K, ‘Access to Justice
–History and Evolution’ <https://shorturl.at/n9gzE>
accessed 08 September 2024.
[6] Eventius C, ‘Basic Principles of
the Legal Aid Legislation and their Incorporation in the Tanzania Legal Aid
Act, 2017’ Legal Aid Journal (Vol. 1, No. 1, 2019) 2.
[8] Fuchs I, ‘Access to Justice
Requires Changes from the Legal System’ <https://shorturl.at/ePx9U>
accessed 12 September 2024.
[9] ibid.
[10] Victor T, History of the Court
System during Colonial Era <https://shorturl.at/siXdH> accessed 12
January 2024.
[11] ibid
[12] Mbunda LX, ‘Procedures of Disputes
Settlement; Pre-colonial to post Independence Tanzania’ (LLM Dissertation,
University of Dar es salaam 1985) 49-54.
[13] Britanicca, ‘Tanganyika historical
state, Tanzania’ <https://www.britannica.com/place/Tanganyika> accessed
29 October 2024
[14] The citizen, ‘Access to Justice in
Tanzania: It is high time the legal system was decolonized’ <https://www.thecitizen.co.tz/tanzania/oped/access-to-justice-in-tanzania-it-is-high-time-the-legal-system-was-decolonised-4250022>
accessed 8 September 2024.
[15] ibid.
[16] Victor (n 10).
[17] ibid
[18] Victor (n 10).
[19] Twaib F, ‘Legal Empowerment of the
Poor: Access to Justice and Rule of Law’ <https://shorturl.at/bkVJg>
accessed 8 September 2024.
[20] ibid
[21] World Justice Program, ‘Access to
Justice’ <https://shorturl.at/eXR1X>
accessed 12 January 2024.
[22] ibid.
[24] Mirindo F, Administration
of Justice in Mainland Tanzania (Law
Africa 2011), 58.
[25] Mnguruta HA and Ndelwa MB, ‘Salient Features of Case Management System Online Training hosted by Institute of Judicial Administration (IJA)’ 18th August, 2022.
0 Comments
PLACE YOUR COMMENT HERE
WARNING: DO NOT USE ABUSIVE LANGUAGE BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST THE LAW.
THE COMMENTS OF OUR READERS IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY.