Semdoup s/o Melita v. R., (PC) Crim. App. 34-A-67, 11/4/68, Platt J.

Semdoup s/o Melita v. R., (PC) Crim. App. 34-A-67, 11/4/68, Platt J.

Accused was convicted of cattle theft. During the trial and prior to his conviction, evidence of previous convictions was introduced. There was also evidence that the complainant had spent Shs. 256/- to pay expenses of persons who had searched for the cattle. The cattle were found and returned to complainant, apparently as a result of the search.

            Held: (1) Evidence of previous convictions should not be accepted until after the conviction, but the error did not prejudice accused in the facts of this case. (2) The award of compensation for expenses incurred by complainant in the search was proper. [Par. 5 of Primary Courts Criminal Procedure Code, Third Schedule, Magistrates court Act, Cap. 537] Appeal as to conviction dismissed.