%20(1).png)
R. v. Messrs. J. M. Kika, Crim. Rev. 130-D-67, 22/11/67, Duff J.
The accused firm was convicted of permitting a vehicle to be used without an existing policy of insurance [Motor Vehicles Insurance Ordinance, Cap. 169, ss. 4(1), 4(2)] after the manager of the firm appeared and pleaded guilty. The trial court suspended the licence of the manager.
Held: A firm or company cannot be disqualified from holding a licence in such circumstances, and it does not appear that the licence of the manager should have been suspended. Case remanded for clarification of the status of the accused firm or person.
%20(10).png)
%20(1).png)
%20(1).png&description=R. v. Messrs. J. M. Kika, Crim. Rev. 130-D-67, 22/11/67, Duff J.){kind=link}
0 Comments
PLACE YOUR COMMENT HERE
WARNING: DO NOT USE ABUSIVE LANGUAGE BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST THE LAW.
THE COMMENTS OF OUR READERS IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY.