CALICO TEXTILE INDUSTRIES LTD. v PYARALIESMAIL PREMJI 1983 TLR 28 (CA)
Court Court of Appeal of Tanzania - Dar Es Salaam
Judge Nyalali CJ, Makame JJA and Kisanga JJA
3 November 1983
CIVIL APPEAL 16 OF 1983 B
Flynote
Civil Practice and Procedure - Appeal - Failure to file appeal within prescribed time -
Appellant represented by Advocate - Whether appeal to be admitted - R.83 Court of
Appeal Rules. C
Civil Practice and Procedure - Appeal - Appeal of time - Advocates failure to check
the law properly - Whether sufficient ground.
-Headnote
The appellant who was represented by an advocate sought to file his appeal out of
time. D The respondent applied to have his Notice of Appeal struck out for failure to
institute his appeal within the prescribed period.
Held: Failure of a party's advocate to check the law is not sufficient ground for
allowing E an appeal out of time.
Case Information
Application allowed.
No case referred to. F
Patel for the appellant
M.A. Lakha for the respondent.
[zJDz]Judgment
Nyalali, C.J. read the following order of the court. This is an application brought by
the G Respondent under Rule 82 of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules 1979 to have
the Notice of Appeal struck out for failure by the appellant to institute his appeal
within the period prescribed by Rule 83 of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 1979.
The application is supported by affidavit of Mr. Lakha, learned Advocate for
Respondent. H
Having heard both sides, it is quite clear that the appeal was filed hopelessly out of
time. The reason for the delay advanced by Mr. Patel for the appellant is that he did
not check the requirements of the law properly. Surely this cannot be sufficient
reason for allowing I Appellant, who is represented by a learned Advocate, to file his
appeal so much out of time.
1983 TLR p29
We therefore allow the application and order the notice of appeal be struck out with
A costs.
B Application allowed.
1983 TLR p29
C
0 Comments
PLACE YOUR COMMENT HERE
WARNING: DO NOT USE ABUSIVE LANGUAGE BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST THE LAW.
THE COMMENTS OF OUR READERS IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY.