THE
CONVENTION RELATING TO THE STATUS OF REFUGEES
Article
1(A) (2) of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees[1], defines a refugee as an
individual who is outside his or her country of nationality or habitual
residence who is unable or unwilling to return due to a well-founded fear of
persecution based on his or her race, religion, nationality, political
ideology, or membership in a particular social group. Applying this definition,
internally displaced persons (IDPS) such as individuals fleeing natural
disasters and generalized violence, stateless individuals not outside their
country of habitual residence or not facing persecution, and individuals who
have crossed an international border fleeing generalized violence are not
considered refugees under either the 1951 convention or the 1967 optional
protocol.
The
1951 Convention, alongside its 1967 Protocol[2], lays down strict criteria
defining who can be recognized as a refugee. Central to this recognition is the
requirement of a well-founded fear of persecution. Individuals seeking refugee
status must demonstrate this fear based on specific grounds: race, religion,
nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.
This criterion sets a high threshold, ensuring that only those facing genuine
threats to their safety and freedoms due to these reasons are considered
eligible for refugee status. Furthermore, the convention necessitates that the
individual be outside their country of nationality to seek refuge. This
condition implies that seeking refugee status while within one’s country of
origin doesn’t fall within the scope of the convention. Moreover, it requires
that the individual is unable or unwilling to avail themselves to the
protection of their country of nationality due to the well-founded fear of
persecution.
The
scope of the convention extends to include those who are stateless, who, by
virtue of events causing fear of persecution, find themselves outside their
former habitual residence. For this kind of individuals without a nationality,
the convention allows for recognition as refugees if they demonstrate an
inability or unwillingness to return to their former residence due to the fear
of persecution. Conversely, individuals who fail to meet these criteria, such
as those facing general hardships or economic difficulties without a basis of
persecution as outlined in the convention, would not qualify as refugees under
this legal framework. The convention serves as a vital guide in international
refugee law, delineating the rights of refugees and the corresponding legal
obligations of nations to ensure their safety and protection. Its provisions
establish a framework aimed at safeguarding individuals fleeing persecution,
ensuring they are not forcibly returned to situations that endanger their lives
or freedoms[3].
REFUGEES ACT OF TANZANIA
As
per the refugees Act of Tanzania[4], a word refugee means a
person who is outside the country of his nationality or if he has no
nationality, the country of his former habitual residence, because he has or
had a well-founded fear of persecution by reasons of his race, religion,
nationality members of a particular social group or particular political
opinion and is unable or, because of such fear, is unwilling to avail himself
of the protection of the government of the country of his nationality, or if he
has no nationality, to return to the country of his former, habitual residence,
Or a person owing to external aggression, occupation, foreign domination or
events seriously disturbing public order in either part or the whole of his
country of origin or nationality, is compelled to leave his place of habitual
residence in order to seek refuge in another place outside his country of
origin or nationality, Or, a person who has been declared in the government
gazette to be a refugee[5].
REFUGEES
ACT vs THE CONVENTION RELATING TO THE STATUS OF REFUGEES
The
definitions of a refugee within the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of
Refugees and the Refugees Act of Tanzania share foundational elements but also
present variations and additional criteria. Both definitions prioritize the
core concept of a well-founded fear of persecution based on identifiable
grounds such as race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social
group, or political opinion. However, the Refugees Act of Tanzania expands the
scope of potential refugee status by incorporating broader circumstances under
which individuals might seek refuge. It encompasses scenarios involving
external aggression, occupation, foreign domination, or events significantly
disrupting public order within part or the entirety of the country of origin.
This broader range of causes acknowledges situations beyond individual
persecution, encompassing broader conflicts or societal disruptions that compel
individuals to seek safety outside their home countries.
In
contrast, the 1951 Convention emphasizes a more specific and narrowly defined
set of grounds for persecution, focusing primarily on personal attributes or
beliefs. The convention’s criteria are more narrowly tailored to protect
individuals facing persecution due to race, religion, nationality, social
group, or political opinion. This specificity ensures a clear and universally
applicable standard for identifying those in need of international protection.
CONCLUSION
Therefore,
while both the international convention and the Tanzanian Refugees Act converge
on the fundamental principles of fear of persecution and the inability to seek
protection, the Tanzanian legislation expands the criteria to include broader
circumstances and introduces a specific governmental declaration mechanism not
explicitly outlined in the international convention. These variations showcase
the Tanzanian Act’s efforts to address a wider range of situations leading to
displacement and to provide a more direct means of official recognition within
its legal framework.
Expanding
the protection of refugees necessitates a balanced approach that combines
global standards. Aligning national definitions with international conventions,
such as the 1951 Refugee Convention, establishes a common ground built on
fundamental principles of persecution based on race, religion, nationality,
social group, or political opinion. This alignment ensures clarity and
consistency in identifying and safeguarding refugees, fostering a unified
understanding across borders. At the same time, acknowledging the diverse
causes of displacement, as illustrated in the Tanzanian Refugees Act, is
crucial. Extending criteria to encompass broader circumstances like conflict,
public disorder, or external aggression allows for a more inclusive approach to
refugee protection. By recognizing these varied contexts, nations can adapt
their frameworks to better address the complex realities faced by displaced
individuals, offering comprehensive assistance to those in need.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS
Elise G, “What Is a
Refugee?”.
CONVENTIONS
UN General Assembly,
Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, 28 July 1951, United Nations,
Treaty Series, vol. 189, p. 137, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/3be01b964.html
[accessed 3 December 2023]
UN General Assembly,
Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 31 January 1967, United Nations,
Treaty Series, vol. 606, p. 267, available at:
https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3ae4.html [accessed 3 December 2023]
STATUTES
Refugees Act, No. 9 of
1998
WEB-SOURCES
Tanzanianweb, “Meanings
of a term "refugee" as given by different sources”
<https://shorturl.at/fiuGS> Accessed December 3, 2023
[1] UN General Assembly, Convention
Relating to the Status of Refugees, 28 July 1951, United Nations, Treaty
Series, vol. 189, p. 137, available at:
https://www.refworld.org/docid/3be01b964.html [accessed 3 December 2023]
[2] UN General Assembly, Protocol
Relating to the Status of Refugees, 31 January 1967, United Nations, Treaty
Series, vol. 606, p. 267, available at:
https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3ae4.html [accessed 3 December 2023]
[3] Elise
G, “What Is a Refugee?”.
[4] Refugees Act, No. 9 of 1998
[5] Tanzanianweb, “Meanings of a term
"refugee" as given by different sources” <https://shorturl.at/fiuGS>
Accessed December 3, 2023
0 Comments
PLACE YOUR COMMENT HERE
WARNING: DO NOT USE ABUSIVE LANGUAGE BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST THE LAW.
THE COMMENTS OF OUR READERS IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY.