%20(1).png)
R.v.Sefu Abdullah, Crim. Rev. 19-D-67; 18/2/67; Otto, J.
Accused were convicted o unlawfully possessing a Government trophy (Cap. 302, ss. 49, 53) upon evidence that they were found in the possession of greater kudu and impala meat.
Held in no case can the possession of game meat support a charge of unlawful possession of Government trophy. The act defines a Government trophy as being a durable portion, and meat is not a durable portion of an animal. The convictions were quashed.
%20(10).png)
%20(28).png)
%20(1).png&description=R.v.Sefu Abdullah, Crim. Rev. 19-D-67; 18/2/67; Otto, J.){kind=link}
0 Comments
PLACE YOUR COMMENT HERE
WARNING: DO NOT USE ABUSIVE LANGUAGE BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST THE LAW.
THE COMMENTS OF OUR READERS IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY.