%20(1).png)
Robert s/o Nyagangare, Crim. App. 48-D-67; 17/2/67; Otto, J.
The accused was convicted on one count of fraudulent false accounting and two counts of stealing by a person employed in the public service. The sentence on the first of these counts was made to run consecutively to the latter two counts, which were to run concurrently with each other.
Held: The fraudulent and false accounting was part and parcel of the charge of theft and arose out of the same transaction. Therefore, all sentences should have been made to run concurrently. It was so ordered.
%20(10).png)
%20(28).png)
%20(1).png&description=Robert s/o Nyagangare, Crim. App. 48-D-67; 17/2/67; Otto, J.){kind=link}
0 Comments
PLACE YOUR COMMENT HERE
WARNING: DO NOT USE ABUSIVE LANGUAGE BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST THE LAW.
THE COMMENTS OF OUR READERS IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY.