%20(1).png)
R. v. Abdulramahman Ali Shirazi, Crim. Rev. 2-Z-64, 8/1/64, Horsfall J.
Accused was convicted of disobeying a lawful order c/s 113 of the Penal Decree. Having been served with a summons in Chwaka, on the same day that it directed him to appear in Mwembeladu,
he knew that he could not appear and so refused the summons.
Held: Conviction quashed, immediate release ordered. The magistrate did not appear to know the true facts.
%20(10).png)
%20(27).png)
%20(1).png&description= R. v. Abdulramahman Ali Shirazi, Crim. Rev. 2-Z-64, 8/1/64, Horsfall J.){kind=link}
0 Comments
PLACE YOUR COMMENT HERE
WARNING: DO NOT USE ABUSIVE LANGUAGE BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST THE LAW.
THE COMMENTS OF OUR READERS IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY.