R. v. Abbasi Mohammed Comorian, Crim. Rev. 8-Z-67, 14/4/67, Kimicha Ag. C. J.
The accused pleaded guilty to driving without a proper licence. His uncle had gone to
Held: (1) On revision, the High Court has the power to consider the merits of a case notwithstanding the fact that the accused pleaded guilty and the case came initially to the High Court for revision on the question of sentence only.
(2) The accused was faced with an emergency situation and it is hardly surprising that he drove to the airport without thinking about licensing technicalities. He was a competent driver; indeed, he made his living as a driver, so it cannot be argued that he was endangering the public safety. The High Court “did not think that any reasonable man placed in the situation of the accused of being required to meet a very sick man in a hurry would have behaved in a more reasonable manner than that pursued by the accused.” Conviction quashed.
0 Comments
PLACE YOUR COMMENT HERE
WARNING: DO NOT USE ABUSIVE LANGUAGE BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST THE LAW.
THE COMMENTS OF OUR READERS IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY.