%20(1).png)
K. K. Namani v. R., Crim. App. 115-D-67; 12/5/67; Duff, J.
Accused firm was convicted of failing to keep records of oral contracts (Employment Ordinance, s. 35 (1),) 35(4) and fined Shs. 400/- and Shs. 450/- respectively on the two counts.
Held: The failure was caused by the fact that the firm had incomplete records; there was nothing sinister in the commissions, and this was the firm’s first offence against this section. In these circumstances the fines were excessive. A fine of Shs. 100/- on both counts was substituted.
%20(10).png)
.png)
%20(1).png)
%20(1).png&description= K. K. Namani v. R., Crim. App. 115-D-67; 12/5/67; Duff, J.){kind=link}
0 Comments
PLACE YOUR COMMENT HERE
WARNING: DO NOT USE ABUSIVE LANGUAGE BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST THE LAW.
THE COMMENTS OF OUR READERS IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY.