Reasons for not admitting Hearsay Evidence

There are several reasons for not admitting hearsay evidence in court proceedings:

Lack of Oath: Hearsay evidence is not given under oath, which undermines its reliability and truthfulness.

Absence of Cross-Examination: Since the person who made the statement is not present as a witness, there is no opportunity for cross-examination to test their credibility and the accuracy of their statement.

Better Evidence Exists: Hearsay evidence suggests that there is more reliable evidence, making it unnecessary to rely on secondhand information.

Prolong Litigation: Admitting hearsay evidence can lead to prolonged legal proceedings due to the need to investigate and verify the statements made by individuals who are not present in court.

Confusion of Assessors: Hearsay evidence can confuse the judges or assessors tasked with weighing the evidence and determining the case's outcome.

Inherent Weakness: Hearsay evidence is inherently weak, as human memory tends to fade over time, and errors may occur during the transmission of information.