R. v. Shaibu Magude; Crim. Rev. 140-D-1971; Biron J.; 10/11/1971.
The accused was an Assistant Field Officer employed by the ministry of Agriculture Food and Cooperatives. He was employed at the
Held: (1) “The accused was a public servant in that he was employed by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Co-operatives as an assistant field officer, and, further, the money which he was given to hand to the two men came into his possession by virtue of his employment. He should therefore have been convicted of stealing by public servant as charged.” (2) “Perhaps for the sake of the record, although It can be argued that it is a fruitless exercise and possibly an idle speculation, the magistrate came to the conclusion be did because he considered that the accused received the moneys on behalf of the two men whom he was to pay. However, whatever was in his mind which he has not disclosed, it was, as I think sufficiently demonstrated, not in accordance with law.” (3) Guilty of theft by public servant.
0 Comments
PLACE YOUR COMMENT HERE
WARNING: DO NOT USE ABUSIVE LANGUAGE BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST THE LAW.
THE COMMENTS OF OUR READERS IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY.