Herman v. Ndava (PC) Civ. App. 2-A-70; 1/3/71; Kwikima Ag. J.
The appellant was ordered to pay Shs. 250/- damages to the respondent by the District Court for defamation of character. The claim was brought under Chagga Customary Law and the facts were admitted by the appellant in the
Held: (1) “Unless Chagga custom varies from village to village, I cannot but disagree with this observation. This same court noted in two recent cases that the customary damages were one goat for a commoner and one fattened goat (Ndafu) for a chief. In the absence of evidence to show that the custom in fact varies from one part of Chaggaland to another, I cannot accept the comment as the correct statement of the law. Accordingly the respondent is to receive Shs. 50/- or one goat.” (20 “As the institution of the chief has long become an anachronism, I presume the respondent will have to be content with a mere goat and not necessarily a fattened one (Ndafu)”.
0 Comments
PLACE YOUR COMMENT HERE
WARNING: DO NOT USE ABUSIVE LANGUAGE BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST THE LAW.
THE COMMENTS OF OUR READERS IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY.