Lemayani v. Mhavi, Civ. App. 136-A-71, 15/7/72; Bramble, J.
This was second appeal against a judgment of a
Held: (1) “The only point taken at the hearing of this appeal was that since the appellant was in possession for more than thirteen years he should not be disturbed. He did not prove that he inherited the land legally from his father so that the period of his father’s possession could count in his favour. Moreover, the trial court found that the father went into possession in 1960 so possession adverse to the respondent was not more than eleven years, and this was not [long enough] for [appellant] to establish his claim.” (3) Appeal dismissed with costs.
0 Comments
PLACE YOUR COMMENT HERE
WARNING: DO NOT USE ABUSIVE LANGUAGE BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST THE LAW.
THE COMMENTS OF OUR READERS IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY.