INTRODUCTION
Article
4
of the Constitution of United Republic of Tanzania[1] provides on separation of
powers where three organs of the state are stated with its exclusive powers
which are to be performed without interference from each other. Judiciary is
among organs of the state stated under article 4, but established under article
107A(i), where it is imposed with judicial powers in dispensing justice. Judiciary
of Tanzania is made up of several kinds of courts with different official
powers in entertaining matters. The judicial hierarchy of United Republic of
Tanzania comprises five courts, to list them the first one is Primary Court
(P.C), District Court (D.C). Resident Magistrates Courts (RMs), High Court
(H.C) and Court of Appeal of Tanzania (C.A.T)[2]. All these five courts are
imposed with different powers in handling civil and criminal matters except for
DCs and RMs with same powers, when one is about to institute civil or criminal
case before court of law, must prior consider powers imposed to that particular
court so as to avoid nullity of its judgments later. According to the law, any
matter determined by a court with no jurisdiction is null and void and lacks
legal force.
Jurisdiction
is
the legal term which means the official power of the court to make legal
decisions and judgments[3]. Not every kind of suit
can be instituted at any court randomly, there is a procedure and a person is
required to follow the hierarchy of the courts while handling his legal
matters. A civil suit which falls within jurisdiction of primary court cannot
be taken to District Court or High Court unless there is a legal room to do so.
As per section 13 of The Civil Procedure Code[4], every suit shall be
instituted in the court of the lowest grade competent to try it and a court of
a resident magistrate and a district court shall be deemed to be courts of the same
grade. Basing on this provision, all suits must be instituted at the courts of
lowest grade with jurisdiction to try it before sending them to superior courts
in the hierarchy except for District Court and Resident Magistrates Courts
which are courts of the same grade or powers, anything falls within
jurisdiction of District Court falls within jurisdiction of RMs either, a
person may decide to institute his suit at DCs or RMs but cannot skip primary
court if the matter on hand falls within jurisdiction of the primary court
located within the territory when cause of action happened. Likewise, A person
cannot skip DCs and RMs and take a matter to High Court when the DCs and RMs
have jurisdiction to entertain the matter.
MAIN
CATEGORIES OF JURISDICTION
Territorial
jurisdiction. This is the power of the court to hear
and determine matter basing on its geographical location[5], every court has its
limited geographical areas where it operates except for High Court which has
unlimited jurisdiction. The Primary Courts which are established and given
powers under section 18 and 19 of The
Magistrates Courts Act[6], have powers only within
the wards where they are established. Districts courts likewise given legal
authority within the districts where they are established, Resident Magistrates
Courts given powers within region they are established. The High Courts is not
tied to a particular geographical location, it operates country wide on
Tanzania main land except for Zanzibar where there is a High Court of Zanzibar.
Court of appeal has no original jurisdiction and cannot hear any matter for the
first time, court of appeal has appellate jurisdiction where all appeals originate from Resident Magistrates with extended
jurisdiction and High Court of Tanzania mainland and Zanzibar are lodged, there
is only one court of appeal shared by both Tanzania mainland and Zanzibar.
Pecuniary
jurisdiction. This is the power of the court to
entertain matter basing on its pecuniary value[7]. A term pecuniary originates
from a Latin term ‘pecunia” which means money, hence pecuniary is defined as
monetary value[8].
The courts in the hierarchy are imposed with different powers on handling
matters basing on its pecuniary value, the primary courts as provided in MCA[9], they are entitled powers to hear civil matters with pecuniary
value of thirty million shillings for immovable property and fifty million for
movable property, District Court under section 40(3) of MCA are
entitled powers to hear civil matters with pecuniary value of seventy million
shillings for immovable property and one hundred million for movable property
which is the same to RMs. The High Court has unlimited jurisdiction, it can
hear matter of any value above one hundred million Tanzanian shillings, H.C is
unlimited to hear matters above 100 million Tanzanian shillings but limited to
hear matters which falls with jurisdiction of subordinate courts, a High Court
cannot hear and determine a manner whose pecuniary value is 50 million
shillings while that value falls within jurisdiction of the subordinate courts.
The Court of Appeal is entitled to hear any appeal of any value originates from
Resident Magistrates with extended jurisdiction and High Court of Tanzania
mainland and Zanzibar.
Subject
matter jurisdiction. This is the power of the court to hear
cases of a particular type or particular subject matter. For-example,
commercial court of Tanzania is a special court for commercial cases only. Land
Division of High Court is special for land matters, Labour Division for labour
matters and Juvenile Court for minor matters. These are courts established to
deal with a particular kind of cases without mixing up other type of cases.
OTHER
CATEGORIES OF JURISDICTION
Original
jurisdiction. This is the exclusive power of the court
to hear matter for the first time[10], for-instance, the High
Court has original jurisdiction on murder cases. A murder case cannot be heard
by any other court apart from High Court. A murder case can be instituted
before District Court or Resident Magistrates Court for committal proceeding
but not for actual trial. Land and Housing Tribunals are given original
jurisdiction to try all matters relating to land, all civil claims arising from
land are legally required to be instituted before Land Tribunals, no one is
allowed to institute land matters before High Court or subordinate court
without prior lodging the same to land tribunals. Also, trade disputes are
required to begin at the business tribunals not going direct to the High Court,
business tribunals are entitled original jurisdiction to try business related
claims.[11]
In
Richard Ndahalawe v. Tanzania Harbours Authority[12],
it was held that, “trade disputes have to follow the prescribed procedure
and there is no room for going to the High Court straight. The High Court has
no original jurisdiction to entertain trade disputes”. Generally, High Court
lacks original jurisdiction over trade and land disputes, it only has appellate
jurisdiction to trade and land matters.
Appellate
jurisdiction. This is the power of the court to hear
matters on appeal, it means the matter has already been heard by lower court, For-instance
an appeal from District/RMs to High Court as provided under section 20 and 25
of the Magistrates Court Act, or appeal from High Court to Court of Appeal of
Tanzania or appeal from primary court to District Court. The appeals may also
come from tribunals established for specific subject matter, appeal may
originate from ward land and housing tribunal to district land and housing
tribunal to High Court land division. Also, High Court has appellate
jurisdiction over all appeals originating from trade tribunals.
Extended
jurisdiction. This is the power given to resident
magistrate to hear matters that would normally fall within the jurisdiction of
High Court. An appeal from a resident magistrate with extended jurisdiction is
lodged before court of appeal and not High Court as per section 45 of the
Magistrates Courts Act. Not every resident magistrate has extended
jurisdiction, extended jurisdiction is a special privilege which may be given
to a magistrate by chief justice. There are other categories of jurisdiction
such as, concurrent jurisdiction, revisional jurisdiction and judicial review
jurisdiction.
THE
QUESTION OF JURISDICTION IS NOT A MATTER OF TECHNICALITY
Jurisdiction
is the power to, or limit to which court may exercise its powers, jurisdiction
is the matter of law and it goes direct to the root of the court function.
Court of law cannot exercise powers which are not given to it by statute hence
the question of jurisdiction is not a matter of technicality but a core legal
requirement for the proper exercise of powers imposed to court of laws.[13] Where court tries or
inquires into any case in which it has no jurisdiction to do so, such
proceedings are nullity.
In
Melisho Sindiko v. Julius Kaaya[14]
a primary court tried a civil suit whose pecuniary value exceeds the pecuniary
value of primary court hence the entire proceedings and decision were null from
day one. The court of appeal ordered to set aside the entire decision of the
court.
In
Abdu Hassan v. Mohamed Ahmed[15],
the plaintiff filed a civil suit in Bunda District Court claiming shs.
280,460/00 being the value of diverse merchandise allegedly delivered to the
respondent upon contract. The district magistrate heard the suit and decided
it. The resident magistrate, on noting the case, forwarded it with
recommendations for revision to the High Court. It later on appeal held that,
(i) The High Court revisional powers under section 79(1) of the Civil Procedure
Code of 1966 are limited to cases where no appeal lies and issues such as
whether the subordinate court has exercised jurisdiction not vested or, if
vested, whether it has failed to exercise the same or has acted illegally or
with material irregularity. (ii) revision taken under the magistrate’s court
act of 1984 has no limitation. (iii) the trial magistrate lacked pecuniary
jurisdiction to entertain the matter and the proceedings are a nullity.
CONCLUSION
A
matter of jurisdiction is necessary when one is trying to institute a suit, a
court cannot depose a valid judgment if it had no jurisdiction from day one
even if the procedures of handling the matter were valid. Courts are not
supposed to exceed their powers either, they have to function only within their
limited powers. Jurisdiction is a matter of law and must be followed, our
courts are established under various laws in Tanzania which set limitation to
its powers. The subordinate courts to say Primary Courts, District Courts,
Resident Magistrates Courts are established under The Magistrates Courts Act
section (20,40-60), the High Court of United Republic of Tanzania is
established under article 107A and its powers are clearly stated under that
article, Court of Appeal of Tanzania is established under the Court of Appeal
Act, where it is imposed only appellate jurisdiction to hear appeals from High
Court of Tanzania and Zanzibar and appeals from resident magistrates court
under magistrates with extended jurisdiction. Court of appeal lacks original
jurisdiction hence no any criminal case or civil suit can be filed for hearing at
court of appeal of Tanzania for first time.
REFERENCE
BOOKS
B.D.
Chipeta (2019), Magistrates Manual, Law Africa Publishing, Pg 3.
D.F.
Mulla, Code of Civil Procedure 1908: in 2 volumes.
UDSM,
“Civil Procedure Manual, 2002
STATUTES
The
Constitution of United Republic of Tanzania, Cap 2 of 1977. Art. 4.
The
Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R: E 2019. Section 13.
The
Law of Limitation Act [CAP. 89 R.E. 2019]
The
Magistrates Courts Act, Cap 11 R: E 2019. Section 18 & 19.
OTHER
Common
wealth governance, “judicial system in united republic of Tanzania” available
at
<https://www.commonwealthgovernance.org/countries/africa/united_republic_of_tanzania/judicial-system/>
accessed May 12, 2022.
Britannica,
“jurisdiction”, available at <
https://www.britannica.com/topic/jurisdiction> accessed May 12, 2022
Yesaya,
J., “concept of jurisdiction in Tanzania”, available at
<https://www.tanzanianweb.co.tz/2020/12/concept-of-jurisdiction-in-tanzania.html>
accessed May 12, 2022
Sheria
na Jamii, “Meaning and types of jurisdictions”, available at <
https://sherianajamii.com/2021/01/meaning-and-types-of-jurisdiction.html>
accessed May 12, 2022
Jaba,
“brief facts about court jurisdiction”, available at
<http://jabashadrack.blogspot.com/2010/05/brief-facts-about-courts-jurisdiction.html>
accessed May 12, 2022
BallotPedia,
“original jurisdiction”, available at <
https://ballotpedia.org/Original_jurisdiction”, accessed May 12, 2022.
LII,
“original jurisdiction”, available at
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/original_jurisdiction accessed May 12,
2022
CASE
LAWS
Richard
Ndahalawe v. Tanzania Harbours Authority, Civil Case No. 422 of 2002(H.C)
Melisho
Sindiko v. Julius Kaaya, [197] LRT No 18
Abdu
Hassan v. Mohamed Ahmed (1989) TLR 181 (H.C)
[1] The Constitution of United
Republic of Tanzania, Cap 2 of 1977. Art. 4.
[2]Common wealth governance, “judicial
system in united republic of Tanzania” available at <https://www.commonwealthgovernance.org/countries/africa/united_republic_of_tanzania/judicial-system/>
accessed May 12, 2022.
[3] Britannica, “jurisdiction”,
available at < https://www.britannica.com/topic/jurisdiction> accessed
May 12, 2022
[4] The Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33
R: E 2019. Section 13.
[5] Yesaya, J., “concept of
jurisdiction in Tanzania”, available at
<https://www.tanzanianweb.co.tz/2020/12/concept-of-jurisdiction-in-tanzania.html>
accessed May 12, 2022
[6] The Magistrates Courts Act, Cap 11
R: E 2019. Section 18 & 19.
[7]
Sheria na Jamii, “Meaning and types of jurisdictions”, available at <
https://sherianajamii.com/2021/01/meaning-and-types-of-jurisdiction.html>
accessed May 12, 2022
[8]
Jaba, “brief facts about court jurisdiction”, available at <http://jabashadrack.blogspot.com/2010/05/brief-facts-about-courts-jurisdiction.html>
accessed May 12, 2022
[9] ibid
[10]
BallotPedia, “original jurisdiction”, available at <
https://ballotpedia.org/Original_jurisdiction”, accessed May 12, 2022.
[11] LII, “original jurisdiction”,
available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/original_jurisdiction accessed May
12, 2022
[12] Richard Ndahalawe v. Tanzania Harbours
Authority, Civil Case No. 422 of 2002(H.C)
[13] B.D. Chipeta (2019), Magistrates
Manual, Law Africa Publishing, Pg 3.
[14] Melisho Sindiko v. Julius Kaaya,
[197] LRT No 18
[15] Abdu Hassan v. Mohamed Ahmed (1989) TLR 181 (H.C)
0 Comments
PLACE YOUR COMMENT HERE
WARNING: DO NOT USE ABUSIVE LANGUAGE BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST THE LAW.
THE COMMENTS OF OUR READERS IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY.