DAR
ES SALAAM REGISTRY
AT
DAR ES SALAAM
CIVIL
CASE NO. 13 OF 2001
PROTAS RAPHAEL……………………..…………………..PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
1. NASSORO SAIDI NASORO……………………. 1ST
DEFENDANT
2. SADIQ HUSSEIN KHATAU…………………..…2ND
DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
KALEGEYA, J.:
The Plaintiff claims from the Defendants
as follows:
a)
That the Defendants be
jointly and severally held liable to pay the Plaintiff a sum of T.Shs.
25,000,000/= being compensation for both maintenance of the dependant of the
Estate of the deceased, anguish and psychological pains suffered by plaintiff
and other dependants.
b)
General and punitive
damages to be assessed by the court by both 1st Defendant as an
employee and 2nd Defendant as employer and owner of the said motor
vehicle with registration No. TZC 2725.
Hearing
proceeded exparte.
The Plaintiff is a Legal Representative
of the deceased’s estate having been so appointed on 20/10/2000 by the Manzese Primary Court
in Probate Cause No. 103/2000.
The
Plaintiff called two witnesses and tendered two documentary Exhibits (P1 and
P2).
Both
PW1 and 2 (Protas Raphael and Peter Mwedisinga, respectively) deposed that one
Raphael Mazengo died due motor vehicle injuries; that the relevant M/v, Reg.
No. TZC 2725 knocked deceased down at Manzese; that the driver of the said
vehicle did not carry the deceased to Muhimbili Hospital
as indicated shortly after the accident but instead off-loaded and abandoned
him after leaving the scene of accident.
He was taken to Hospital by good Samaritans. He died three days later. The vehicle and driver were subsequently
traced. The latter was arrested and
charged with causing death through careless driving and driving a motor vehicle
without a valid Certificate of Insurance.
He was convicted of the former and acquitted of the latter. He was sentenced to a fine of 30,000/= or 24
months in jail. This is also as per Exh.
P1, a copy of judgment in Traffic Case No. 582/98 of Ilala District Court at
Kinondoni – R v Nassoro Said Nassoro.
As
regards the cause of death, Exh. P2, a postmortem Examination Report shows that
the deceased, Raphael Uliza Mazengo died two days prior to the date (22/1/98) when
the postmortem was conducted and that the cause of death was “Multiple Injuries
with Multiple Fracture of upper and lower limb Bones”.
The
Plaintiff deposed that the compensatory sum is claimed because deceased was the
bread earner for the family including seven children who no longer go to
school. Compensation is also claimed for
serious psychological pains and suffering by the children and family. It was also deposed that the deceased was
both a farmer at Busoga, Bagamoyo and a businessman at Tandale market earning
between Tshs. 200,000 and 300,000/= a month.
On
the evidence available, it has been established that indeed the deceased died
due injuries caused by the motor vehicle belonging to the 2nd
Defendant and driven by the 1st Defendant and that the latter was at
the time driving carelessly. Both the
driver and the owner are liable to effect compensation to the family for the
loss sustained due to the departed for good bread-earner. The 2nd Defendant comes in on
grounds of vicarious liability.
The
next question is how much should this Court order as a befitting compensation? Although it is difficult to assess, in monetary
terms, the loss of a bread-earner let alone of human life, considering the
deceased’s status in life as portrayed by the Plaintiff, I am persuaded that
the sum of shs. 25 million claimed is reasonable. It is accordingly granted. However, the claim under prayer (b) having
not been proved stands disallowed.
In
conclusion, judgment is hereby entered in favour of the Plaintiff for a
compensatory sum of shs. 25 million with costs.
DATED
at DAR ES SALAAM this day
of 2009.
L. B. KALEGEYA
JUDGE
View other posts for your benefit...
0 Comments
PLACE YOUR COMMENT HERE
WARNING: DO NOT USE ABUSIVE LANGUAGE BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST THE LAW.
THE COMMENTS OF OUR READERS IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY.